Brontosaurus vs. Brachiosaurus: Comparing Long Necks

By: Zach Taras  | 
Can you tell one large sauropod dinosaur from another? JoeLena / Getty Images

Brontosaurus vs. Brachiosaurus species are easy to confuse. They're two dinosaurs, both giants, both sauropods, but vastly different in some key ways.

When people picture iconic sauropod dinosaurs, these two often come to mind. But the Brontosaurus vs. Brachiosaurus debate isn’t just about size. There were key differences in body structure, feeding strategies and even how they held their necks.

Advertisement

A Tale of Two Dinosaurs

Brontosaurus and Brachiosaurus both lived in the Late Jurassic Period, millions of years ago. They were both massive sauropods with four legs, long tails and small heads at the end of very long necks, which were themselves incredible feats of evolutionary engineering.

dinosaur
Brontosaurus.
ZU_09 / Getty Images

But they weren’t just two different species; they were from completely separate genera. The name Brontosaurus, meaning "thunder lizard," describes a giant dinosaur with a long whip-like tail, a muscular body with shorter front limbs and a horizontal posture.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Brachiosaurus altithorax, or the "arm lizard," stood out with its longer forelimbs, giving it a more vertical stance, much like a giraffe-like dinosaur reaching high canopies.

Advertisement

Body Structure: More Than Just Size

Brontosaurus and Brachiosaurus were both large sauropod dinosaurs, but their body structure set them apart.

Brontosaurus had a more horizontal posture, with a long tail that stayed parallel to the ground, supported by slightly shorter front legs and powerful hind limbs. It had a thick, long neck but a relatively small head, which helped it graze on ground vegetation.

Advertisement

dinosaur
Brachiosaurus.
Joe Regan / Getty Images

Brachiosaurus, on the other hand, was one of the tallest dinosaurs, with longer forelimbs and a deep chest. Unlike Brontosaurus, which had a lower neck posture, Brachiosaurus had a thinner neck that reached toward the treetops, making it a high browser.

Advertisement

Differing Habitats

This anatomical difference between Brontosaurus and Brachiosaurus allowed them to coexist in the Morrison Formation without competing for food, although both had somewhat different habitats.

Brontosaurus probably stuck to marshes and plains, whereas the specialized feeding abilities of Brachiosaurus allowed them to thrive in forests.

Advertisement

Feeding Strategies: Ground Level vs. High Canopies

The main difference between Brontosaurus and Brachiosaurus comes down to their feeding strategies. While both were herbivorous, their dietary habits allowed them to thrive in different ecological niches.

Brontosaurus, with its long muscular tail and more horizontal posture, was better suited for munching on ground-level vegetation. Its closely related relatives also shared this herbivorous lifestyle, making use of their lung system to support their massive size.

Advertisement

Brachiosaurus, with its high-reaching neck and longer forelimbs, had a feeding strategy more akin to today’s giraffes. Its large nare (nostril opening) and distinct nare placement suggest an efficient respiratory system for reaching high vegetation.

Fossils, Discovery and Controversy

The name Brontosaurus was coined by Othniel Charles Marsh in the late 19th century, based on fossils found in Wyoming's Morrison Formation. For a long time, paleontologists debated whether Brontosaurus was actually a separate genus or just a species of Apatosaurus.

Recent studies have confirmed that Brontosaurus belongs to its own genus, with three species now recognized. This article explains the evolution of this debate in paleontology.

Advertisement

As of research published in 2015, Brontosaurus is widely accepted to be its own genus, but only a few years prior, popular science publications were arguing that Apatosaurus was the correct name for these sauropods.

Brachiosaurus was first described by Elmer Riggs in 1903, and its fossils found in North America and Africa solidified its status as one of the best-known dinosaurs.

Unlike Brontosaurus, which had a shorter tail and slightly shorter front legs, Brachiosaurus, with its shorter hind legs, had a body structure that made it one of the largest dinosaurs ever to roam the Earth.

Advertisement

Social Behavior: Solitary Animals or Herd Dweller?

Fossil evidence suggests that Brachiosaurus may have been more of a herd animal, moving in groups to protect against predators.

Brontosaurus, on the other hand, may have been more solitary, using its height to survey its surroundings and avoid threats. Its long whip-like tail could have been used for defense, making it a formidable presence.

Advertisement

While both dinosaurs relied on their sheer size for protection, their differing feeding strategies and body structures likely influenced their social behaviors.

We created this article in conjunction with AI technology, then made sure it was fact-checked and edited by a HowStuffWorks editor.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Loading...